<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MattLog.net &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattlog.net/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattlog.net</link>
	<description>Matts Admin Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:37:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Auto Deploy Multiple vmware Virtual Machines</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/21/auto-deploy-multiple-vmware-virtual-machines/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/21/auto-deploy-multiple-vmware-virtual-machines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#8217;t posted for a while&#8230; here goes. Here is my PowerShell script to deploy multiple vmware virtual machines using a template and a custom specification file. You can use this script to create an unlimited number of VM&#8217;s, all with unique computer names and static IP addresses. The following attributes need to be configured for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t posted for a while&#8230; here goes.</p>
<p>Here is my PowerShell script to deploy multiple vmware virtual machines using a template and a custom specification file. You can use this script to create an unlimited number of VM&#8217;s, all with unique computer names and static IP addresses.</p>
<p>The following attributes need to be configured for your individual environment.</p>
<p><strong>$server_address</strong> = Change this to your vCenter Server address<br />
<strong>$username</strong> = Change this to the user with permission to create new VM&#8217;s using the desired template<br />
<strong>$password</strong> = The user&#8217;s password<br />
<strong>$destination_host</strong> = Change this to any host in your vmware cluster<br />
<strong>$template_name</strong> = Change this to the required template<br />
<strong>$customization</strong> = Change this to the required customization file<br />
<strong>$location</strong> = Use this to deploy the VM to a specific folder<br />
<strong>-SubnetMask</strong> = Change this to the netmask for you new servers<br />
<strong>-DefaultGateway</strong> = Change this to the default gateway for your VM&#8217;s<br />
<strong>-Dns</strong> = Add your DNS servers in order separated with a comma (,)</p>
<p><strong>$array</strong> = This is the list of the servers you wish to create. The values here are the NETBIOS names for the servers, so chose them wisely. Remember to wrap each server name in quotation marks (&#8220;) and separate each server with a comma (,)<br />
<strong>$iparray</strong> = This is the list of IP&#8217;s you want to allocate the VM&#8217;s. Each IP is assigned to a machine in the $array</p>
<p>Save the following to a text file and rename it to .PS1</p>
<blockquote>
<pre><span style="color: #008000;"># Virtual Center Details</span>
$server_address = "vCenterServer"
$username = "Administrator"
$password = "password"</pre>
<pre><span style="color: #008000;"># Vm Details</span>
$destination_host = "AnyVMHost.network.LOCAL"
$template_name = "Template1"
$datastore_name = "DataStore1"
$customization = "Customization1"
$location = "vCenter folder location"</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<pre><span style="color: #008000;"># Name the VMs in this array</span>
$array = "Server1", "Server1"
$iparray = "10.1.1.10", "10.1.1.11"
$a= 0

Connect-VIServer -Server $server_address -Protocol https
-User $username -Password $password
foreach ($vm in $array)
{
Get-OSCustomizationSpec $customization | Get-OSCustomizationNicMapping |
Set-OSCustomizationNicMapping -IpMode UseStaticIP -IpAddress $IParray[$a]
-SubnetMask 255.255.255.0 -DefaultGateway 10.1.1.1 -Dns 10.1.1.2,10.1.1.3
$vm=New-VM -Name $vm -Location $location -Template $template_name
-Host $destination_host -Datastore $datastore_name -OSCustomizationSpec
$customization -Confirm:$false $a = $a + 1
}
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Or just download the file from <a href="http://mattlog.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/AutoDeployVMwareVirtualMachineTemplate.txt" target="_blank">http://mattlog.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/AutoDeployVMwareVirtualMachineTemplate.txt</a> (NOTE: you need to rename the file to .PS1)</p>
<p>You need to download the vmware vSphere PowerCLI application and install it on the machine you would like to build the VM&#8217;s from. You can download the PowerCLI extension from <a href="http://www.vmware.com/go/powercli" target="_blank">www.vmware.com/go/powercli</a> (you need a free vmware accou<cite><strong> </strong></cite>nt to download)</p>
<p>Run the PS1 file created earlier from the PowerCLI command line and the script will cycle through your array and create the virtual machines.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/21/auto-deploy-multiple-vmware-virtual-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digg Advertising Scientology</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/12/digg-advertising-scientology/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/12/digg-advertising-scientology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange to see Google put a Scientology ad on the Digg.com site&#8230; Doubt there&#8217;d be many click-throughs. Posted by Matt Shadbolt http://mattlog.net Please comment or click an ad to support this site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange to see Google put a Scientology ad on the Digg.com site&#8230; Doubt there&#8217;d be many click-throughs.</p>
<p><a href="http://mattlog.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/photo.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-268" title="DiggScientology" src="http://mattlog.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/photo.png" alt="" width="320" height="480" /></a></p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2010/07/12/digg-advertising-scientology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office WebApp Installation PreReqCheck Fails on FilterPack 2</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2010/05/12/office-webapp-installation-prereqcheck-fails-on-filterpack-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2010/05/12/office-webapp-installation-prereqcheck-fails-on-filterpack-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharepoint 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office Web Apps installation may fail with an error that suggests Microsoft FilterPack 2.0 &#8211; even if you&#8217;ve installed the FilterPack with SharePoint 2010. You will find in the setup logs: Either FilterPack 2.0 is not installed or it is not the correct version (minimum requirement &#8211; 14.0.4709.1000) Seems that the SharePoint 2010 installation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office Web Apps installation may fail with an error that suggests Microsoft FilterPack 2.0 &#8211; even if you&#8217;ve installed the FilterPack with SharePoint 2010.</p>
<p>You will find in the setup logs:</p>
<blockquote><p>Either FilterPack 2.0 is not installed or it is not the correct version (minimum requirement &#8211; 14.0.4709.1000)</p></blockquote>
<p>Seems that the SharePoint 2010 installation installs an older build of the FilterPack 2.0. You need to install the 14.0.4709 version by downloading the file from Softpedia (I can&#8217;t find this build on the MS site)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/Office-Filter-Packs-Download-144582.html">http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/Office-Filter-Packs-Download-144582.html</a></p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2010/05/12/office-webapp-installation-prereqcheck-fails-on-filterpack-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computerworld.com.au Article &#8211; 2010: The year to move away from 2003</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2010/04/28/computerworld-com-au-article-2010-the-year-to-move-away-from-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2010/04/28/computerworld-com-au-article-2010-the-year-to-move-away-from-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computerworld.com.au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAGE-AU member Matt Shadbolt says its time to move to Microsoft Server 2008 28 April, 2010 16:34 http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/344669/2010_year_move_away_from_2003/ During the second half of 2009 Microsoft released two enterprise products that will be shaping your next three years deployment schedules: Microsoft Server 2008 R2 and Microsoft Exchange 2010. These two products mark a milestone in server [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAGE-AU member Matt Shadbolt says its time to move to Microsoft Server  2008<br />
28 April, 2010 16:34</p>
<p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/344669/2010_year_move_away_from_2003/" target="_blank">http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/344669/2010_year_move_away_from_2003/</a></p>
<div id="article_body">
<p>During the second half of 2009 Microsoft released  two enterprise products that will be shaping your next three years  deployment schedules: Microsoft Server 2008 R2 and Microsoft Exchange  2010. These two products mark a milestone in server and application  performance, reliability and maturity of two major technology shifts –  the move away from Server 2003 and Exchange 2003.</p>
<p>Although Microsoft Server 2008 RTM was released in  early 2008, and Exchange 2007 released in late 2006, their huge shift in  core infrastructure discouraged a large amount IT decision makers away  from the new platforms. The 2008 R2 and 2010 versions of these platforms  should change this view. The features have been polished, the  reliability is higher than ever and their performance has been  significantly improved. There is now absolutely no reason for any  organisation to be still deploying legacy systems into their  environment. It’s finally time to move on.</p>
<p>Although  there is no “wow’” feature added to Microsoft Server 2008 R2, there are  some significant improvements to the feature set.  Improved  Virtualisation support &#8211; finally adding High-Availability features &#8211;  almost bridges the gap with VMware (but that’s a conversation for  another time). Remote Desktop Services (formally Terminal Services) adds  support for Remote-App and Virtual Desktops &#8211; a competitor for Citrix’s  application presentation and virtual desktop products &#8211; add tangible  value to the deployment of 2008.  Performance and productivity have been  improved significantly – now only supporting 64-bit processors – and a  large amount of usability improvements found in Windows 7 have been  added, allowing admins to have a consistent experience from desktop to  server, and niceties that the end user will appreciate, such as multiple  monitors in terminal services.</p>
<p>What’s the  largest reason for the move to 08? Frankly, it&#8217;s time. There’s no solid  reason for CIO’s to still be deploying Windows Server 2003. It’s seven  years old, let it die.</p>
<p>Arguably the Exchange  platform is Microsoft’s most important enterprise application offering.  It’s been the market leader since Exchange 2000 (Corporate mail  platform, not MTA which is owned by Sendmail) and many believe Exchange  2003 to be the best platform release. Exchange 2007 was released in late  2006 and was a huge change in direction. The entire code base was  rewritten with a role based design, the administrative tools moved to a  command shell and the entire product designed with a vision of unified  communications. Enterprise found it hard to justify the move to 2007 &#8211;  having to upgrade all their hardware to 64-bit and retraining their  staff was expensive. Now that almost all new hardware is 64-bit only,  and your support staff have had time to learn the new ways, now is the  perfect time to deploy Exchange 2010.</p>
<p>Exchange  2010 builds on the work done in 2007, and makes performance and feature  improvements. Its unified communication offering has expanded by  providing voicemail to text translation, adds built-in archiving and  adds end user improvements such as rich client delivery via browsers  other than Internet Explorer. Exchange 2010 is also Microsoft’s first  real move into a hybrid on-premise/off-premise cloud offering – we’ll  need to wait and see how well this is implemented, but I’m sure all  CIO’s are watching closely.</p>
<p>With these two new  offerings, Microsoft are in a terrific position for 2010 and beyond. For  any CIO or IT manager, the time is right to look at upgrade strategy.  The technology is mature, your staff know how to use it and your admins  know how to support it. 2010 is the year to move away from 2003.</p>
<p><em> &#8220;Matt Shadbolt is a member of the not-for-profit  IT Operations and System Administrator profession organisation, SAGE-AU.  For more information go to  <a href="http://www.sage-au.org.au/" target="_blank">the SAGE-AU Website</a></em></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
</div>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2010/04/28/computerworld-com-au-article-2010-the-year-to-move-away-from-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enable Windows 7 Taskbar Preview Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2010/03/15/enable-windows-7-taskbar-preview-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2010/03/15/enable-windows-7-taskbar-preview-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a quick and easy way to enable Windows 7&#8242;s Taskbar Preview of individual Firefox tabs built into the 3.6 version. Open Firefox and type into the address bar: about:config Agree to the warning. (note: about:config has lots of settings &#38; changing some of them may cause Firefox to break) In the Filter input box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a quick and easy way to enable Windows 7&#8242;s Taskbar Preview of individual Firefox tabs built into the 3.6 version.</p>
<p>Open Firefox and type into the address bar:</p>
<p><em>about:config</em></p>
<p>Agree to the warning. (note: about:config has lots of settings &amp; changing some of them may cause Firefox to break)</p>
<p>In the Filter input box type <em>browser.task. </em>You should receive three options:</p>
<p>browser.taskbar.previews.cachetime<br />
browser.taskbar.previews.enable<br />
browser.taskbar.previews.max</p>
<p>Change the .enable to TRUE and press enter. You should now have tab preview enabled on the Firefox taskbar icon.</p>
<p>Enjoy</p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2010/03/15/enable-windows-7-taskbar-preview-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyper-V &#8216;Unspecified error&#8217;(0&#215;80004005)</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2009/12/30/hyper-v-unspecified-error0x80004005/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2009/12/30/hyper-v-unspecified-error0x80004005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(0x80004005)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you receive the following Hyper-V error when starting one of your VM&#8217;s on Server 2008 R1, follow the link to the hotfix below. &#8216;VMSERVER&#8217; could not initialize machine remoting system. Error: &#8216;Unspecified error&#8217;(0&#215;80004005). (Virtual machine XXXX-XXXXX-XXXXXX-XXXXX) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;967902&#38;sd=rss&#38;spid=12925 This hotfix is suggested for all users, not only those affected by the error. Posted by Matt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you receive the following Hyper-V error when starting one of your VM&#8217;s on Server 2008 R1, follow the link to the hotfix below.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;VMSERVER&#8217; could not initialize machine remoting system. Error: &#8216;Unspecified error&#8217;(0&#215;80004005). (Virtual machine XXXX-XXXXX-XXXXXX-XXXXX)</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;967902&amp;sd=rss&amp;spid=12925">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;967902&amp;sd=rss&amp;spid=12925</a></p>
<p>This hotfix is suggested for all users, not only those affected by the error.</p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2009/12/30/hyper-v-unspecified-error0x80004005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2009/11/12/rip-ignored-v2-update-from-bad-source/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2009/11/12/rip-ignored-v2-update-from-bad-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you receive the following message when configuring two cisco routers to share routes via RIP v2: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.1.1 Run the no validate-update-source on your rip configuration and the updates will start to work. router rip no validate-update-source Posted by Matt Shadbolt http://mattlog.net Please comment or click an ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you receive the following message when configuring two cisco routers to share routes via RIP v2:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 192.168.1.1</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Run the no validate-update-source on your rip configuration and the updates will start to work.</p>
<p><code>router rip<br />
no validate-update-source </code></p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2009/11/12/rip-ignored-v2-update-from-bad-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave Invites</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/30/google-wave-invites/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/30/google-wave-invites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi All, I&#8217;ve just been given 10 new Google Wave invitations &#8211; add a comment below with your email address and I&#8217;ll hook you up. Cheers, Mat. Posted by Matt Shadbolt http://mattlog.net Please comment or click an ad to support this site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just been given 10 new Google Wave invitations &#8211; add a comment below with your email address and I&#8217;ll hook you up.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Mat.</p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/30/google-wave-invites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare STOP: 0x0000005D</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/16/vmware-stop-0x0000005d/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/16/vmware-stop-0x0000005d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STOP: 0x0000005D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This error occurs if you have configured the VM&#8217;s General Options to be a 32-bit Operating System and booting from a 64-bit Windows Server disk. Posted by Matt Shadbolt http://mattlog.net Please comment or click an ad to support this site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This error occurs if you have configured the VM&#8217;s General Options to be a 32-bit Operating System and booting from a 64-bit Windows Server disk.</p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/16/vmware-stop-0x0000005d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backup Exec Exchange Restore Only Displays 32 Mailboxes</title>
		<link>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/01/backup-exec-exchange-restore-only-displays-32-mailboxes/</link>
		<comments>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/01/backup-exec-exchange-restore-only-displays-32-mailboxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Shadbolt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32 mailboxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup Exec 12.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlog.net/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a known issue with Backup Exec 12.5 where tape based brick-level Exchange 2007 backups only display 32 recoverable mailboxes (http://support.veritas.com/docs/315374) This is a massive issue! Recently when trying to recover an archived mailbox, I was shocked to find only 32 mailboxes (out of over 100) available to restore. After some research I found it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a known issue with Backup Exec 12.5 where tape based brick-level Exchange 2007 backups only display 32 recoverable mailboxes (<a href="http://support.veritas.com/docs/315374">http://support.veritas.com/docs/315374</a>)</p>
<p>This is a<strong> massive</strong> issue! Recently when trying to recover an archived mailbox, I was shocked to find only 32 mailboxes (out of over 100) available to restore. After some research I found it&#8217;s a known issue with Backup Exec and installing SP2 should resolve the issue. It did resolve the issue &#8211; well, sort of.</p>
<p>The problem is, it doesn&#8217;t fix the problem retroactively! That means any of your old backup tapes that were used prior to SP2 have unrecoverable mailboxes. To access the hidden mailboxes there is a work around (no fix though), and if you often need to recover archives your not going to be happy.</p>
<p>In order to restore these mailboxes you need to duplicate the backup tape to disk. Once you&#8217;ve duplicated the information store/s to a Backup-To-Disk folder you then need to re-catalog the image. You will then see all of your backed up mailboxes.</p>
<p>I doubt Symantec will fix this problem, as SP2 was released June 09 and they are not-surprisingly silent about the issue.</p>
<p>Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 SP2 can be download from<a href="http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/323735.htm"> http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/323735.htm</a></p>
Posted by Matt Shadbolt<br>
<a href ="http://mattlog.net">http://mattlog.net</a><br>
Please comment or click an ad to support this site<br>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattlog.net/2009/10/01/backup-exec-exchange-restore-only-displays-32-mailboxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
