Backup Exec Exchange Restore Only Displays 32 Mailboxes
Posted October 1st, 2009 by Matt ShadboltThere’s a known issue with Backup Exec 12.5 where tape based brick-level Exchange 2007 backups only display 32 recoverable mailboxes (http://support.veritas.com/docs/315374)
This is a massive issue! Recently when trying to recover an archived mailbox, I was shocked to find only 32 mailboxes (out of over 100) available to restore. After some research I found it’s a known issue with Backup Exec and installing SP2 should resolve the issue. It did resolve the issue – well, sort of.
The problem is, it doesn’t fix the problem retroactively! That means any of your old backup tapes that were used prior to SP2 have unrecoverable mailboxes. To access the hidden mailboxes there is a work around (no fix though), and if you often need to recover archives your not going to be happy.
In order to restore these mailboxes you need to duplicate the backup tape to disk. Once you’ve duplicated the information store/s to a Backup-To-Disk folder you then need to re-catalog the image. You will then see all of your backed up mailboxes.
I doubt Symantec will fix this problem, as SP2 was released June 09 and they are not-surprisingly silent about the issue.
Symantec Backup Exec 12.5 SP2 can be download from http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/323735.htm
Posted by Matt Shadbolthttp://mattlog.net
Please comment or click an ad to support this site
Tags: 32 mailboxes, Backup Exec 12.5, Symantec
2 Responses

2 Responses to “Backup Exec Exchange Restore Only Displays 32 Mailboxes”
November 13th, 2009 at 3:58 am
Thanks for the very clear explanation of the problem and the retroactive issue. I appreciate you taking the time to document and explain this.
December 24th, 2009 at 5:01 am
Hi,
I have a serious problem with backup exec 12.5 to restore Exchange 2007. the backup passed without problem but when I try to restore I can’t, I get a message that means it can’t attach the ressource.
if you have any Idea, help me.
if you need other infos ask me thanks
Leave a Reply